ACC vs Ambuja Cements (2026): Financials, Valuation, Growth & Which Is Better?
ACC looks cheaper and currently produces better ROE and ROCE, while Ambuja Cements is the much larger listed business, has a stronger net margin, better operating-cash-flow conversion and a slightly higher Bull Run Score.
There is one fact that changes the entire comparison: ACC is a subsidiary of Ambuja Cements Limited. That means ACC vs Ambuja is not the same kind of contest as TCS vs Infosys or HDFC Bank vs ICICI Bank. Investors are comparing a listed cement operating company with the listed parent platform that already has economic exposure to ACC.
That ownership structure is why simply declaring the stock with the lower P/E as the winner would be misleading.
ACC vs Ambuja Cements: what is the quick verdict?
ACC currently wins on valuation and capital-return ratios; Ambuja wins on scale, cash conversion, net margin and overall strategic breadth.
ACC's P/E of roughly 13.6x is dramatically below both Ambuja's 24.7x and the cement-industry P/E of 32.46x in Bull Run's current dataset. ACC also reports ROCE of about 10.9% and ROE of about 10.9%, versus Ambuja's 4.9% ROCE and 8.4% ROE.
Ambuja, however, is roughly four times ACC's market capitalisation and is building a much broader cement platform. Its FY2025-26 integrated report says consolidated cement capacity reached 109 MTPA, with a target of 119 MTPA in FY2026-27. The group is integrating assets including Orient, Penna and Sanghi.
For investors, this creates two different propositions. ACC offers a cheaper listed operating-company exposure. Ambuja offers exposure to the larger consolidation and capacity-expansion platform.
Why ACC vs Ambuja is not a normal peer comparison
ACC and Ambuja should not be analysed as if they were completely independent competitors because ACC is controlled through Ambuja Cements.
ACC's own official corporate material states that ACC Limited is a subsidiary of Ambuja Cements Limited and part of the Adani portfolio. The companies may still have separate listed shares, operating assets, financial statements and valuations, but their strategic direction is increasingly connected.
This matters when interpreting market capitalisation, capacity, costs and future synergies. Buying Ambuja is not simply buying "another cement company" alongside ACC. Ambuja is the broader listed parent through which a substantial part of the Adani cement consolidation strategy is being executed.
That is also why Ambuja's growth story cannot be understood only from its legacy standalone plants. Recent acquisitions and integration are a central part of the current investment case.
ACC vs Ambuja Cements financial comparison
ACC is cheaper and currently generates stronger capital-return ratios, while Ambuja has the higher profit margin and better operating-cash-flow conversion.
| Metric | ACC | Ambuja Cements | Current Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market capitalisation | ₹25,983 Cr | ₹108,127 Cr | Ambuja on scale |
| P/E ratio | 13.61x | 24.71x | ACC on cheaper earnings valuation |
| P/B ratio | 1.26x | 1.82x | ACC |
| Industry P/E | 32.46x | 32.46x | Same sector benchmark |
| ROE | 10.93% | 8.38% | ACC |
| ROCE | 10.90% | 4.88% | ACC |
| Net profit margin | 7.52% | 10.98% | Ambuja |
| Debt-to-equity | ~0.00 | ~0.00 | Both very low |
| Interest coverage | 20.19x | 15.66x | ACC |
| Current ratio | 1.97x | 1.05x | ACC |
| Operating cash flow / net profit | -0.64x | 1.13x | Ambuja |
| Promoter holding | 56.69% | 67.68% | Ambuja |
| Promoter pledge | 0% | 0% | Both |
| FII holding | 5.83% | 5.63% | Similar |
| DII holding | 21.12% | 19.44% | Similar |
| Bull Run Score | 47.1/100 | 54.8/100 | Ambuja |
The table shows why this comparison deserves more than a one-line verdict. ACC looks statistically cheap, but Ambuja currently converts reported earnings into operating cash more convincingly and operates from a far larger strategic base.
Which company is bigger: ACC or Ambuja?
Ambuja Cements is substantially larger by market value and strategic cement-platform scale.
At Bull Run's 25 August 2026 snapshot, Ambuja's market capitalisation is roughly ₹1.08 lakh crore compared with about ₹25,983 crore for ACC. That makes Ambuja a little over four times larger by listed market value.
Ambuja's FY2025-26 integrated report states that consolidated cement capacity reached 109 MTPA and that management is targeting 119 MTPA by FY2026-27. The report also highlights the integration of acquired assets including Orient, Penna and Sanghi.
ACC remains an important operating cement brand with a long history, but investors should understand that the current strategic centre of gravity sits at the wider Ambuja-led platform.
How do the businesses of ACC and Ambuja differ?
Both manufacture cement and related building materials, but Ambuja now represents a broader consolidation platform while ACC remains a separately listed operating subsidiary with its own brand and assets.
ACC
ACC manufactures cement and ready-mix concrete and also sells construction-related products including waterproofing compounds, mortars, tile adhesives and specialised concrete products. Its distribution network serves individual home builders, contractors, infrastructure customers and institutional buyers.
The important strategic point is that ACC now operates inside the Ambuja-Adani cement structure rather than as an isolated cement group.
Ambuja Cements
Ambuja manufactures and markets cement and related building materials across India. Its current strategy is much more expansion-heavy. The FY2025-26 integrated report describes a 109 MTPA consolidated platform and a planned move to 119 MTPA in FY2026-27.
The report also describes a push toward logistics integration, renewable power, cost reduction, capacity utilisation and operational integration of acquired businesses.
Which is cheaper: ACC or Ambuja Cements?
ACC is materially cheaper on both P/E and P/B in the current Bull Run snapshot.
ACC trades at approximately 13.61x trailing earnings against Ambuja's 24.71x. Both are below Bull Run's current cement-industry P/E of 32.46x, but ACC's discount is much larger.
ACC also trades at approximately 1.26x book value versus Ambuja's 1.82x.
That does not automatically make ACC the better investment. A lower valuation can reflect weaker earnings expectations, company-specific concerns, parent-subsidiary complexity or lower anticipated growth. The right question is whether the discount is larger than the difference in future economics.
Which has better profitability: ACC or Ambuja?
ACC currently generates stronger returns on capital, while Ambuja reports the better net profit margin.
ACC's ROE is about 10.93%, compared with Ambuja's 8.38%. ACC's ROCE is also considerably higher at approximately 10.90% versus Ambuja's 4.88%.
That gives ACC the advantage if the investor focuses on current capital efficiency.
Ambuja's net profit margin, however, stands near 10.98%, ahead of ACC's roughly 7.52%. The difference suggests that the two companies currently turn revenue into bottom-line profit differently even though ACC generates better returns relative to the capital base measured in Bull Run's data.
Which has the stronger balance sheet?
Both companies show very low leverage, but ACC has stronger current liquidity and interest coverage in the present snapshot.
ACC's debt-to-equity ratio is effectively zero. Ambuja's is also extremely low at roughly 0.001.
ACC reports interest coverage around 20.2x compared with Ambuja's 15.7x. ACC's current ratio is approximately 1.97x, versus roughly 1.05x for Ambuja.
On these measures alone, ACC looks more conservatively positioned. But Ambuja's broader group-level expansion programme means investors should separately monitor acquisition integration, capital expenditure and the consolidated cash needs of the larger platform.
Which has better cash-flow quality?
Ambuja has the clearer advantage in the latest operating-cash-flow conversion measure available in Bull Run's dataset.
Ambuja's operating cash flow to net profit ratio is approximately 1.13x. That means operating cash flow in the relevant measurement period exceeded reported net profit.
ACC's comparable ratio is negative at approximately -0.64x. A negative conversion ratio deserves investigation because reported profit and cash generation are moving in different directions.
This does not prove permanent weakness in ACC. Cement businesses can experience working-capital swings, tax movements, inventory changes and timing differences. But it is precisely the kind of discrepancy an investor should investigate in the cash-flow statement rather than dismiss.
ACC vs Ambuja promoter holding and institutional ownership
Ambuja has the higher promoter holding, while both companies currently show zero promoter pledging.
| Ownership Metric | ACC | Ambuja |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter holding | 56.69% | 67.68% |
| Promoter pledge | 0% | 0% |
| FII holding | 5.83% | 5.63% |
| DII holding | 21.12% | 19.44% |
| Recent FII holding change | -0.10 percentage point | -0.24 percentage point |
| Recent DII holding change | -0.50 percentage point | -0.42 percentage point |
Institutional ownership is relatively similar. The more important structural difference is that ACC itself is a controlled subsidiary of Ambuja.
Which stock has performed better recently?
Both stocks have had a weak year, although ACC has marginally outperformed Ambuja over the latest one-year period in Bull Run's dataset.
| Period | ACC | Ambuja | Better Relative Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -2.61% | -2.83% | ACC |
| 3 months | -8.46% | -10.15% | ACC |
| 6 months | -19.04% | -19.34% | ACC |
| 1 year | -27.76% | -28.90% | ACC |
These differences are small compared with the overall decline. Both stocks have traded well below their respective 52-week highs.
ACC is around 34.3% below its 52-week high of ₹1,987, while Ambuja is around 31.2% below its 52-week high of roughly ₹600.8 in the database snapshot.
Price weakness can improve valuation, but falling price alone does not create value. Investors should first determine whether earnings expectations or industry economics have changed.
What do the technical indicators say?
Both stocks are trading below important medium-term moving averages and have relatively weak RSI readings.
| Technical Metric | ACC | Ambuja |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹1,305.90 | ₹413.10 |
| 20-day SMA | ₹1,351.12 | ₹429.10 |
| 50-day SMA | ₹1,352.94 | ₹427.82 |
| 100-day SMA | ₹1,369.13 | ₹433.61 |
| 200-day SMA | ₹1,534.82 | ₹480.17 |
| RSI (14) | 30.99 | 32.95 |
| 30-day volatility | 22.36% | 24.87% |
The purpose of this section is context, not a trading signal. A low RSI or price below a moving average does not by itself mean a stock is cheap or ready to reverse.
What is the growth story for Ambuja Cements?
Ambuja's current growth story centres on scale expansion, acquisition integration, utilisation improvement and cost reduction.
Its FY2025-26 integrated report states that consolidated capacity reached 109 MTPA after additions from organic expansion, acquisitions and debottlenecking. Management is targeting 119 MTPA by FY2026-27.
The company says it is integrating Orient, Penna and Sanghi assets and increasingly focusing on stabilising newly commissioned capacity and improving utilisation.
That means future returns depend not merely on adding tonnes of cement capacity but on turning that capacity into profitable volumes and acceptable ROCE.
What is the investment case for ACC?
ACC's current appeal is primarily its lower valuation, stronger capital-return ratios and very low leverage.
Its P/E of roughly 13.6x is less than half the sector benchmark in Bull Run's current dataset. The P/B ratio is also lower than Ambuja's, and both ROE and ROCE currently exceed Ambuja's.
The concern is cash conversion. ACC's latest operating-cash-flow-to-net-profit measure is negative, and its recent quarterly sales and profit growth figures in the Bull Run snapshot are weak.
ACC therefore looks statistically inexpensive, but the investment argument requires evidence that profitability and cash generation can stabilise or improve within the integrated Adani cement platform.
ACC strengths and risks
ACC strengths
- Much lower P/E than Ambuja and the industry benchmark.
- Lower P/B ratio.
- Higher current ROE and ROCE than Ambuja.
- Effectively debt-free in Bull Run's current ratio data.
- Strong interest coverage.
- Zero promoter pledge.
- Benefits from being part of a much larger integrated cement platform.
ACC risks
- Weak recent share-price performance.
- Negative operating-cash-flow conversion measure in the latest dataset.
- Recent quarterly profit and sales growth are weak.
- Parent-subsidiary structure complicates a simple independent-company comparison.
- Cement remains cyclical and sensitive to energy, freight, demand and industry capacity.
Ambuja Cements strengths and risks
Ambuja strengths
- Much larger market capitalisation and strategic platform.
- 109 MTPA consolidated capacity reported for FY2025-26.
- Target of 119 MTPA by FY2026-27.
- Higher net profit margin than ACC.
- Better operating cash flow conversion in the current snapshot.
- Very low balance-sheet leverage.
- Zero promoter pledge.
- Higher Bull Run Score at 54.8/100.
Ambuja risks
- More expensive valuation than ACC.
- Lower current ROE and ROCE.
- Large acquisition and integration programme creates execution risk.
- Capacity additions need sufficient utilisation to create acceptable returns.
- Recent share-price and quarterly growth performance remain weak.
ACC vs Ambuja: which is better on valuation, growth and financial quality?
Better valuation: ACC
ACC's P/E and P/B are significantly lower.
Better current ROE and ROCE: ACC
ACC currently produces the stronger capital-return ratios.
Better profit margin: Ambuja
Ambuja's current net margin is around 11%, compared with roughly 7.5% for ACC.
Better operating cash conversion: Ambuja
Ambuja's operating cash flow currently provides stronger support for reported profit.
Greater strategic scale and expansion runway: Ambuja
Ambuja is the larger listed platform and is integrating a substantial national cement footprint.
Lower leverage: effectively a tie
Both currently show extremely low debt-to-equity ratios.
The most accurate conclusion is not “ACC is better” or “Ambuja is better.” ACC currently offers the cheaper valuation and stronger return ratios. Ambuja offers greater scale, better cash conversion and broader strategic exposure. The choice depends on whether the investor prioritises valuation and present capital efficiency or the economics of the larger integrated cement platform.
ACC vs Ambuja Cements FAQs
Is ACC owned by Ambuja Cements?
Yes. ACC's official website identifies ACC Limited as a subsidiary of Ambuja Cements Limited.
Which is cheaper, ACC or Ambuja?
ACC. In Bull Run's 25 August 2026 snapshot, ACC trades at about 13.61x earnings versus Ambuja at about 24.71x.
Which has higher ROE?
ACC. ACC's current ROE is approximately 10.93%, compared with 8.38% for Ambuja.
Which has higher ROCE?
ACC. ACC's current ROCE is approximately 10.90%, versus 4.88% for Ambuja.
Which has the better net profit margin?
Ambuja. Its current net profit margin is approximately 10.98%, compared with 7.52% for ACC.
Which company has more debt?
Neither currently shows meaningful debt relative to equity in Bull Run's snapshot. Both debt-to-equity ratios are close to zero.
Which stock has the better Bull Run Score?
Ambuja's current Bull Run Score is 54.8/100, compared with 47.1/100 for ACC.
Research sources
- Bull Run: ACC share price, fundamentals and financial analysis
- Bull Run: Ambuja Cements share price, fundamentals and financial analysis
- Bull Run: Cement & Cement Products sector
- ACC official corporate profile and ownership context
- Ambuja Cements Integrated Report 2025-26
- Ambuja Cements manufacturing capacity and expansion
Disclaimer
This comparison is educational and informational only. It is based on Bull Run's available market and financial dataset as of 25 August 2026 plus company disclosures. Financial ratios, prices, ownership data and technical indicators change over time. A lower valuation, higher score or stronger historical metric does not guarantee future returns. This article does not recommend buying, selling or holding ACC, Ambuja Cements or any other security. Bull Run is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst or Investment Adviser.