Cholamandalam Investment vs Shriram Finance (2026): AUM, NIM, Vehicle Finance & Which Is Better?

Chola vs Shriram Finance (2026): Which Is Better?
Two lenders built around India's mobility economy · Q1 FY2027

Cholamandalam Investment and Shriram Finance both understand vehicles better than most lenders in India, but their portfolios are no longer the same business wearing different names.

Chola's vehicle-finance book now represents less than half of total AUM as mortgages, home loans, SME, consumer finance and gold loans scale.

Shriram remains much more tied to mobility. Commercial and passenger vehicles together account for almost 69% of AUM.

That creates different earnings behaviour through auto cycles, freight cycles and periods of rural stress.

Chola Q1 FY27 AUM₹2.54 lakh crore
Shriram Q1 FY27 AUM₹3.14 lakh crore

The direct answer: Chola is growing faster; Shriram has more capital and a cheaper valuation

Cholamandalam grew AUM approximately 23% year on year, compared with Shriram Finance at 15.3%.

Chola also reported ROE around 21.2%.

Shriram's Q1 ROE was approximately 12.8% after the balance sheet absorbed the enormous new equity investment from MUFG.

That does not mean Chola's business economics are permanently almost twice as good.

Shriram's equity denominator changed dramatically during the quarter.

The important question is how quickly Shriram deploys that fresh capital into high-return lending assets.

Chola vs Shriram Finance: Q1 FY2027 scoreboard

Metric Cholamandalam Shriram Finance Current Reading
Market capitalisation₹153,802 Cr₹243,380 CrShriram Finance
AUM₹254,392 Cr₹313,798 CrShriram Finance
AUM growth23%15.26%Cholamandalam
Q1 standalone PAT₹1,654 Cr₹3,445 CrShriram on scale
PAT growth~46%~60%Shriram Finance
Net income / NII margin~8.2%9.04% NIMShriram Finance
GNPA, RBI basis4.50%4.64%Chola slightly
NNPA, RBI basis2.95%2.33%Shriram Finance
Ind AS Gross Stage 33.29%Different presentation emphasisDo not mix definitions
Current return-on-assets disclosure3.7% PBT-ROA~3.93% ROADefinitions are not identical
ROE21.2%~12.76%Chola, but Shriram is equity-infusion diluted
Capital adequacy19.81%34.17%Shriram Finance
Tier-I capital14.81%33.40%Shriram Finance
Liquidity coverage ratio193.61%262.54%Shriram Finance
P/E26.74x21.50xShriram Finance
P/B5.05x3.69xShriram Finance
Dividend yield0.11%1.04%Shriram Finance
Bull Run Score65.8/10048.8/100Cholamandalam

Shriram Finance is larger, but Chola is closing the AUM gap quickly

Shriram Finance ended June with AUM of approximately ₹3.14 lakh crore.

Chola ended the quarter at approximately ₹2.54 lakh crore.

The absolute gap is therefore around ₹59,000 crore.

But Chola's AUM grew 23%, versus Shriram at 15.3%.

If that growth differential persisted for several years, Chola would close the scale gap meaningfully.

The key word is if.

AUM growth becomes progressively harder as newer businesses mature and the starting base increases.

Chola is no longer primarily a vehicle financier

Vehicle finance accounted for approximately ₹1.24 lakh crore, or just under 49% of total AUM.

The remainder now spans mortgages, housing, SMEs, consumer and small-enterprise loans, secured business finance and gold loans.

Chola Q1 FY27 AUM mix

  • Vehicle finance: ₹1,24,132 Cr.
  • Loan against property: ₹54,130 Cr.
  • Home loans: ₹23,644 Cr.
  • Consumer & small enterprise: ₹15,884 Cr.
  • SME loans: ₹9,923 Cr.
  • Secured business & personal loans: ₹3,730 Cr.
  • Gold loans: ₹2,143 Cr.

What that means

  • Less dependence on vehicle cycles.
  • More mortgage-linked secured lending.
  • More cross-selling to small businesses.
  • Potentially different credit-cost behaviour.
  • More branches and operational complexity.
  • Greater ability to compound beyond auto finance.

Shriram is still structurally a mobility lender

Commercial vehicles alone represent approximately 46.9% of AUM.

Passenger vehicles add another 21.9%.

Together, those two categories account for almost 69% of the portfolio.

Shriram Q1 FY27 AUM mix

  • Commercial vehicles: ₹1,47,034 Cr.
  • Passenger vehicles: ₹68,650 Cr.
  • MSME: ₹41,962 Cr.
  • Two-wheelers: ₹17,814 Cr.
  • Construction equipment: ₹12,373 Cr.
  • Personal loans: ₹11,421 Cr.
  • Gold loans: ₹7,514 Cr.
  • Farm equipment: ₹7,031 Cr.

What that means

  • Deep vehicle-underwriting expertise.
  • High sensitivity to freight and transport activity.
  • Strong used-vehicle knowledge.
  • Collateral values matter materially.
  • Rural and semi-urban reach is central.
  • MSME and gold provide diversification.

The largest difference is underwriting culture

Shriram built its franchise around customers mainstream banks historically found difficult to underwrite.

Truck owners, small fleet operators, first-time buyers and informal businesses often have irregular documented cash flow.

Shriram's competitive advantage is field-level borrower knowledge, collateral understanding and recovery infrastructure.

That produces higher lending yields but also structurally higher headline NPA ratios than prime consumer lenders.

Chola built a similarly local franchise but is broadening faster

Chola's roots are also in vehicle finance and smaller-town borrowers.

The difference today is the pace of diversification.

Loan against property is already more than ₹54,000 crore.

Home loans exceed ₹23,000 crore.

SME lending grew 39% year on year.

Secured business and personal loans grew roughly 40%.

Those categories can support AUM growth even when vehicle sales normalise.

Chola's Q1 profit growth came from better spread and lower credit cost

Standalone PAT increased approximately 46% to ₹1,654 crore.

PBT increased roughly 45% to ₹2,220 crore.

Net income increased about 28% to ₹4,930 crore.

The net income margin improved from approximately 7.8% to 8.2%.

Cost of funds fell toward 6.7%.

Loan losses and provisions moderated toward approximately 1.5%.

This is operating leverage in a lending business: AUM grows 23%, but profit grows almost twice as fast.

Shriram's Q1 earnings acceleration was even stronger

Standalone PAT increased roughly 60% to ₹3,445 crore.

Net interest income increased approximately 34%.

NIM expanded from about 8.11% to 9.04%.

Operating efficiency improved materially.

The company also benefited from a lower funding burden after receiving fresh equity capital.

This is why current quarterly earnings growth dramatically exceeds AUM growth.

The MUFG transaction completely changed Shriram Finance's capital structure

MUFG Bank invested approximately ₹39,618 crore into Shriram Finance through a preferential equity issue.

That is an enormous capital infusion relative to Shriram's previous net worth.

By June 30, the company had used approximately ₹37,451 crore of the proceeds.

Capital adequacy increased to approximately 34.17%.

Tier-I capital reached approximately 33.40%.

Debt-to-equity fell sharply to about 2.14 times.

This means Shriram enters the next growth cycle with far more capital than it immediately needs.

The fresh equity helps earnings but temporarily hurts ROE

Shriram's Q1 ROE fell toward 12.8% even though PAT increased 60%.

That seems contradictory until the denominator is considered.

The company suddenly has tens of thousands of crores of additional equity.

That capital cannot be transformed into seasoned, profitable loans overnight.

ROE will therefore remain diluted until AUM catches up with the enlarged net worth.

For investors, the deployment rate of the MUFG capital is now almost as important as quarterly PAT growth.

Chola has no comparable ROE distortion

Chola reported Q1 ROE of approximately 21.2%, up from 18.8% a year earlier.

Its net worth grew through retained earnings and capital actions without a Shriram-sized sudden equity injection.

That makes the current ROE much closer to the operating economics of the active loan book.

At today's numbers, Chola is clearly more efficient on shareholder equity.

But Shriram currently has the higher lending margin

Shriram's Q1 NIM was approximately 9.04%.

Chola's net income margin was approximately 8.2%.

Both are high compared with prime-bank lending margins because both companies operate in higher-yielding vehicle, MSME and underserved borrower segments.

Shriram's used-vehicle and non-prime customer mix supports especially high yields.

The trade-off is higher headline NPA ratios and collection intensity.

Shriram itself expects NIM to normalise

Management has indicated that the current 9%-plus margin includes benefits that should not be treated as permanent.

The MUFG capital reduces immediate borrowing needs.

Some capital is temporarily parked before being deployed into loans.

Over time, Shriram expects NIM to trend closer to a longer-run level around the mid-8% range as capital gets deployed and product mix evolves.

This makes Q1's 9.04% margin a strong number, but not necessarily the correct forever assumption.

Asset quality gives a split verdict

Chola has the slightly lower gross NPA, while Shriram has the meaningfully lower net NPA.

Chola RBI-basis GNPA was approximately 4.50%.

Shriram's was 4.64%.

Chola NNPA was approximately 2.95%.

Shriram's was 2.33%.

The gap in net NPA indicates Shriram has recognised more provisions against its stressed asset pool.

Q1 asset quality weakened modestly at both lenders

This deserves monitoring, but June-quarter seasonality matters in vehicle finance.

Chola GNPA increased from approximately 4.36% in March to 4.50% in June.

Its Gross Stage 3 ratio increased from about 3.05% to 3.29%.

Shriram GNPA edged up to 4.64% from approximately 4.58% in March.

Management teams in vehicle finance often see weaker Q1 collections before activity improves later in the financial year.

The important test is whether those ratios reverse rather than continue deteriorating through subsequent quarters.

Chola's credit-cost trajectory is currently encouraging

Loan losses and provisions moderated toward approximately 1.5% despite 23% AUM growth.

That reduction contributed heavily to the 45%-plus profit growth.

If AUM can continue growing above 20% while credit cost remains around this level, Chola's earnings can compound materially faster than assets.

The risk is that newer lending businesses have not all been tested through a full downturn.

Shriram has more absolute stressed assets but also much more capital to absorb them

Its Q1 provision coverage ratio on NPAs was approximately 51%.

Capital adequacy above 34% provides an enormous solvency buffer.

That does not make credit losses irrelevant.

Every bad loan still reduces earnings and capital.

But the company now has far greater capacity to absorb a cyclical deterioration without constraining growth.

Liquidity also favours Shriram

Shriram's liquidity coverage ratio was approximately 262.5%.

Chola's was approximately 193.6%.

Both are well above regulatory minimums.

Shriram's ratio reflects its unusual post-equity-infusion liquidity position.

Chola also reported approximately ₹23,984 crore of total liquidity including undrawn sanctioned lines.

Neither lender currently faces a visible liquidity constraint.

Shriram has built a powerful retail deposit funding franchise

Public deposits represented approximately 31% of Shriram's borrowing mix in Q1 FY2027.

Other funding sources included bank term loans, NCDs, securitisation, ECB loans and international bonds.

This diversification reduces dependence on any single wholesale-funding market.

It also allows Shriram to match funding tenure more closely with vehicle-loan assets.

Chola relies more heavily on institutional funding but remains diversified

Chola funds growth through bank borrowings, bonds, securitisation and other institutional channels.

The board approved up to ₹55,000 crore of NCD issuance capacity during the latest results cycle.

The company has maintained comfortable ALM across time buckets.

Its cost of funds fell to roughly 6.7% in Q1.

Funding efficiency is especially important because even a 20-basis-point change in borrowing cost becomes large on a ₹2.5 lakh crore lending franchise.

Vehicle-cycle exposure is materially higher at Shriram

Commercial and passenger vehicles represent almost 69% of its AUM.

This creates upside when vehicle sales, freight utilisation and resale values are strong.

It also creates downside if freight rates collapse, fuel costs rise sharply or used-vehicle prices weaken.

Shriram's underwriting experience is specifically designed to manage those risks.

But portfolio concentration cannot be completely diversified away through experience alone.

Chola's diversification changes its next ten years

Vehicle finance is still the largest segment, but it no longer determines the entire company.

Mortgages and home loans together exceed ₹77,000 crore.

SME and secured business lending are growing near 40%.

Gold loans are being expanded through dedicated branches.

If these businesses produce vehicle-finance-like returns through a complete credit cycle, Chola can sustain high growth for longer.

If they do not, diversification can reduce rather than improve capital efficiency.

Shriram's next diversification leg could be gold and MSME

Gold-loan AUM increased approximately 46% year on year.

Management has set ambitious medium-term goals for the category.

MSME AUM is already above ₹41,000 crore.

These businesses offer faster growth than some mature vehicle categories and can use Shriram's large branch network.

But Shriram's core identity will remain transport finance for the foreseeable future simply because the existing vehicle book is enormous.

Valuation currently favours Shriram Finance

Shriram trades at approximately 21.5x earnings versus Chola at 26.7x.

Price-to-book is around 3.69x for Shriram and 5.05x for Chola.

That is a significant valuation discount.

Chola's premium reflects faster AUM growth, higher current ROE and a more diversified lending mix.

Shriram's lower valuation reflects higher gross NPAs, vehicle concentration and temporarily diluted ROE.

But Shriram's new equity makes P/B more complicated than usual

MUFG's ₹39,618 crore investment massively increased book value in one quarter.

A lower post-issue P/B partly reflects that newly issued equity.

Investors should therefore focus on future ROE on the enlarged book rather than celebrating a lower P/B in isolation.

If Shriram cannot deploy capital at attractive spreads, the cheap-looking book multiple may be justified.

If it can restore ROE toward the high teens while growing AUM, the current valuation can look much more compelling.

Chola's 5x book valuation leaves less room for execution mistakes

A lender trading above five times book needs strong and durable ROE.

Chola's current 21.2% ROE supports that premium.

But the market is already assuming fast growth and controlled credit cost.

A sustained rise in GNPA, weaker new-business profitability or slower AUM growth could therefore create both earnings disappointment and multiple compression.

The market has already rerated Shriram dramatically

Market MetricCholamandalamShriram Finance
Price on 25 Aug 2026₹1,873₹1,138.50
1-month return+8.62%+7.25%
3-month return+18.60%+18.20%
6-month return+7.14%+3.07%
1-year return+24.09%+83.38%
52-week high₹1,952.50₹1,153.70
52-week low₹1,299.40₹566.50
RSI (14)58.0969.97

Shriram has almost doubled from its 52-week low and is trading close to its 52-week high.

Its one-year return above 80% shows that the MUFG transaction, margin expansion and profit growth have already been recognised substantially by the market.

Chola has also delivered a strong one-year gain but with far less volatility.

Cholamandalam: what investors are buying

The strengths

  • 23% AUM growth.
  • 46% PAT growth.
  • 21.2% ROE.
  • Improving margin.
  • Controlled credit cost.
  • Fast SME expansion.
  • Growing mortgage franchise.
  • Increasing product diversification.

The risks

  • P/B above 5x.
  • GNPA increased sequentially.
  • New lending categories need seasoning.
  • Vehicle finance still represents almost half of AUM.
  • Rapid branch expansion raises operating cost.
  • High growth can conceal weaker future vintages.

Shriram Finance: what investors are buying

The strengths

  • ₹3.14 lakh crore AUM.
  • 60% Q1 PAT growth.
  • 9.04% NIM.
  • Lower NNPA than Chola.
  • 34.17% capital adequacy.
  • Large retail-deposit franchise.
  • Deep vehicle underwriting expertise.
  • MUFG strategic capital.

The risks

  • AUM growth trails Chola.
  • GNPA remains above 4.6%.
  • ROE is diluted by fresh capital.
  • Vehicle concentration remains high.
  • Current 9% NIM may normalise.
  • Stock has already rerated sharply.

Chola vs Shriram Finance: who currently wins each category?

AUM scale: Shriram Finance.

AUM growth: Cholamandalam.

Q1 PAT growth: Shriram Finance.

Current lending margin: Shriram Finance.

Gross NPA: Cholamandalam slightly.

Net NPA: Shriram Finance.

Current ROE: Cholamandalam, with MUFG dilution caveat for Shriram.

Capital adequacy: Shriram Finance by a wide margin.

Tier-I capital: Shriram Finance.

Liquidity: Shriram Finance.

Portfolio diversification: Cholamandalam.

Vehicle-finance depth: Shriram Finance.

Current P/E: Shriram Finance.

Current P/B: Shriram Finance.

One-year stock performance: Shriram Finance.

Bull Run Score: Cholamandalam.

Final view: Cholamandalam currently has the stronger growth-and-capital-efficiency profile. AUM is expanding above 20%, ROE is above 21% and newer businesses are reducing dependence on vehicle finance. Shriram Finance has the stronger balance-sheet optionality: it is larger, earns a higher lending margin, has lower net NPA, far more capital, greater liquidity and a cheaper P/E and P/B. The MUFG investment temporarily makes Shriram's ROE look weak because equity arrived before it could be fully deployed. Chola is currently the cleaner high-growth compounding story. Shriram is the lower-valued scale-and-capital-deployment story whose next major test is restoring high ROE on its enlarged equity base.

Chola vs Shriram Finance FAQs

Which company is bigger?

Shriram Finance, with approximately ₹3.14 lakh crore of AUM compared with Cholamandalam at about ₹2.54 lakh crore.

Which is growing AUM faster?

Cholamandalam, at approximately 23% year on year compared with Shriram Finance around 15.3%.

Which has lower gross NPA?

Cholamandalam slightly, at 4.50% versus Shriram Finance at 4.64%.

Which has lower net NPA?

Shriram Finance at approximately 2.33%, compared with Cholamandalam at 2.95%.

Which has higher ROE?

Cholamandalam currently, at approximately 21.2%. Shriram's current ROE is temporarily diluted by the large MUFG equity infusion.

Which is better capitalised?

Shriram Finance by a wide margin, with Q1 capital adequacy above 34% compared with Chola around 19.8%.

Which stock is cheaper?

Shriram Finance on both current P/E and P/B.

Which is more diversified outside vehicle finance?

Cholamandalam. Vehicle finance is now below half of its AUM, while commercial and passenger vehicles together remain nearly 69% of Shriram Finance AUM.

Research sources

Disclaimer

This comparison is educational and informational only. Vehicle-focused NBFCs should be assessed using lender-specific metrics such as AUM growth, funding cost, NIM or net income margin, Stage 3 assets, RBI GNPA and NNPA, credit cost, liquidity and regulatory capital. ROA definitions can differ between pre-tax and post-tax reporting and are therefore identified where relevant. Financial metrics and market prices change over time. Nothing here recommends buying, selling or holding Cholamandalam Investment, Shriram Finance or any other security. Bull Run is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst or Investment Adviser.