IDBI Bank vs IndusInd Bank (2026): ROA, Capital, Recovery Risk & Which Is Better?
One bank already earns almost 1.9% ROA. The other is still trying to reach 1%.
IDBI Bank versus IndusInd Bank is not a normal peer comparison. It is a profitability-gap comparison.
IDBI Bank reported Q1 FY2027 return on assets of 1.89%.
IndusInd Bank's annualised ROA was approximately 0.78%.
After removing the benefit of interest received on an income-tax refund, IndusInd's underlying ROA was closer to roughly 0.63%.
That means IDBI is not merely somewhat more profitable.
It is currently operating in a fundamentally different return regime.
IndusInd's investment case is therefore based on convergence: if management can rebuild credit growth, reduce credit cost and move quarterly ROA toward its stated 1% exit target, the valuation can improve.
IDBI's investment case is the reverse: the economics are already strong, so investors need to decide how much of that quality—and how much privatisation optionality—is already priced in.
The Bull Run profitability-gap test
The key commercial question is whether IndusInd can close these gaps quickly enough to make its lower P/B valuation more attractive than IDBI's already-proven profitability.
IDBI Bank vs IndusInd Bank: Q1 FY2027 scoreboard
| Metric | IDBI Bank | IndusInd Bank | Current Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 PAT | ₹2,115 Cr | ₹1,037 Cr consolidated | IDBI |
| PAT growth | +5% | +71.7% | IndusInd growth from depressed base |
| NII | ₹3,486 Cr | ₹4,685 Cr | IndusInd absolute scale |
| NII growth | +10% | +1% | IDBI |
| Deposits | ₹3,25,757 Cr | ₹4,14,766 Cr | IndusInd scale |
| Deposit growth | +10% | +4.44% | IDBI |
| Net advances | ₹2,58,968 Cr | ₹3,26,274 Cr | IndusInd scale |
| Advance growth YoY | +22% | -2.22% | IDBI |
| Advance growth QoQ | +2% | +3.29% | IndusInd recovery signal |
| CASA ratio | 43.64% | 29.43% | IDBI |
| Reported NIM | 3.61% | 3.57% | Looks close on headline |
| Normalized IndusInd NIM | 3.61% | ~3.35% | IDBI |
| ROA | 1.89% | ~0.78% | IDBI |
| Underlying IndusInd ROA ex tax-refund interest | 1.89% | ~0.63% | IDBI |
| ROE | 14.80% | ~6.26% | IDBI |
| GNPA | 2.30% | 3.25% | IDBI |
| NNPA | 0.16% | 0.95% | IDBI |
| Provision coverage | 99.31% | 71.42% | IDBI |
| Credit-deposit ratio | 79.50% | ~78.66% | Effectively similar |
| CRAR | 26.92% | 17.15% | IDBI |
| Tier 1 | 26.38% | 16.10% | IDBI |
| 28 Aug P/E | 10.69x | 58.50x | IDBI; IndusInd P/E distorted |
| 28 Aug P/B | 1.59x | 1.17x | IndusInd cheaper book |
Start with the metric that is hardest to fake: ROA
IDBI Bank earns approximately ₹1.89 for every ₹100 of assets on an annualised basis.
IndusInd earns roughly ₹0.78.
After adjusting IndusInd's Q1 for the income-tax-refund interest, underlying ROA was lower still.
For a bank comparison, this is far more informative than comparing absolute profits.
IndusInd has the larger balance sheet and more deposits, but IDBI currently extracts far more shareholder profit from each unit of banking assets.
IDBI's profitability is not dependent on the privatisation event
This distinction is essential.
IDBI already has:
- 1.89% ROA.
- 3.61% NIM.
- 22% advance growth.
- 43.64% CASA.
- 0.16% NNPA.
- 26.92% capital adequacy.
The proposed strategic sale may change ownership and future strategy.
It is not the reason the bank produces attractive current economics.
IDBI's liability franchise is materially stronger
CASA:
43.64% versus IndusInd at 29.43%.
That fourteen-percentage-point difference is large.
IDBI has a much greater share of deposits sitting in relatively low-cost current and savings balances.
Its cost of deposits fell to approximately 4.59% in Q1 FY2027.
Cost of funds fell to around 4.68%.
IndusInd has been deliberately repairing its funding mix
Deposits grew 3.7% sequentially and 4.44% year on year.
Retail deposits have been improving as management reduces dependence on less-sticky funding sources.
But CASA fell to 29.43%.
That remains a structural disadvantage compared with IDBI.
Headline NIM makes the banks look almost identical
IDBI:
3.61%.
IndusInd:
3.57% reported.
A four-basis-point difference would normally be irrelevant.
But this is not a clean comparison.
IndusInd's reported NIM included a one-off tax-refund benefit
The bank received approximately ₹284 crore of interest on an income-tax refund.
Reported NIM therefore rose to 3.57%.
Excluding that benefit, normalized NIM was approximately 3.35%.
That changes the comparison materially.
IDBI's normalized margin advantage is closer to 26 basis points, not four.
The same adjustment matters for ROA
IndusInd's annualised Q1 ROA was around 0.78%.
Excluding tax-refund interest, underlying ROA was closer to roughly 0.63%.
Management is targeting approximately 1% quarterly ROA by the end of FY2027.
The target itself tells investors something important:
IndusInd management does not consider the current profitability level to be the destination.
IDBI is already well beyond IndusInd's immediate ROA milestone
IDBI's 1.89% is almost twice IndusInd's stated 1% exit target.
This does not automatically mean IDBI's stock must outperform.
A recovering bank can create large shareholder returns by moving from poor economics toward average economics.
But it means the investment cases are fundamentally different.
IndusInd's best Q1 signal is not the 72% PAT growth
The best signal is that advances grew sequentially for the first time after several quarters of contraction.
Advances increased approximately 3.3% quarter on quarter to ₹3.26 lakh crore.
Year on year, they were still down about 2.2%.
The recovery has therefore started sequentially, but it has not yet become year-on-year growth.
This distinction matters more than the headline PAT growth
IndusInd's consolidated PAT increased around 72% year on year.
But NII increased only 1%.
The profit increase was supported heavily by:
- lower provisions.
- lower operating expenses.
- a depressed comparison base.
- the tax-refund interest benefit.
This is a legitimate recovery.
It is not yet a high-quality revenue-compounding quarter.
IDBI's PAT growth is much slower—but the starting level is much stronger
IDBI profit increased only 5% year on year.
NII grew 10%.
That looks less exciting than IndusInd's headline growth.
But IDBI generated ₹2,115 crore of profit from a smaller deposit franchise.
The bank is growing from a much stronger profitability base.
This is the classic level-versus-direction problem
IDBI has the better level.
IndusInd has the sharper recovery direction.
Commercial stock analysis needs both.
A bank growing profit 70% from a weak base can still earn less attractive returns than a bank growing profit 5% from an already high-return base.
Asset quality gives IDBI one of the widest advantages in the comparison
GNPA:
IDBI 2.30%.
IndusInd 3.25%.
NNPA:
IDBI 0.16%.
IndusInd 0.95%.
The net-NPA difference is particularly significant.
IDBI has provisioned almost the entire recognised stressed book
Provision coverage is approximately 99.31%.
IndusInd's PCR is approximately 71.42%.
This does not mean IDBI cannot generate new NPAs.
It means old recognised bad loans have far less unprovided economic exposure remaining.
IndusInd's asset quality is moving in the right direction
GNPA fell from 3.43% sequentially to 3.25%.
NNPA improved from 1.00% to 0.95%.
Provisions declined to ₹1,384 crore.
Gross slippages also improved materially.
This is exactly what a turnaround needs.
It is simply not yet comparable with IDBI's current residual-risk profile.
The MFI and vehicle-finance books remain important for IndusInd
IndusInd historically built important franchises in vehicle finance and microfinance.
Those businesses can generate attractive yields.
They can also create elevated credit costs when borrower cash flows weaken.
Management is now deliberately diversifying the retail, SME and rural franchises and reducing dependence on unstable pockets.
The bank's governance history also changes the required proof standard
IndusInd's 2025 derivatives-accounting problem produced an impact of roughly $230 million and triggered a major leadership reset.
Rajiv Anand subsequently took over as MD & CEO.
The bank has since focused on:
- balance-sheet repair.
- governance controls.
- deposit franchise stability.
- credit-cost normalization.
Investors therefore need more than one profitable quarter before treating the old governance discount as fully resolved.
There are signs that external confidence is improving
In August 2026, CRISIL revised the outlook on IndusInd Bank's long-term debt instruments to Stable from Negative while reaffirming its ratings.
The rationale included:
- improved earnings profile.
- stabilising deposit franchise.
- greater share of granular deposits.
- strategic movement toward more stable asset segments.
This does not eliminate recovery risk, but it is an important independent signal that the balance-sheet repair is gaining credibility.
Capital is where IDBI's advantage becomes extraordinary
IDBI CRAR:
26.92%.
IndusInd:
17.15%.
Tier 1:
IDBI 26.38%.
IndusInd 16.10%.
Both are above regulatory requirements.
IDBI is in a completely different capital-surplus position.
What can IDBI do with that excess capital?
Potential uses include:
- supporting faster credit growth.
- absorbing ECL transition.
- funding strategic investment.
- allowing a future controlling shareholder to reshape the bank.
- supporting shareholder distributions over time.
The challenge is using capital productively rather than merely carrying it.
IDBI's 14.8% ROE needs to be interpreted alongside its enormous capital buffer
A bank with 26%+ Tier 1 capital is far less leveraged than a typical commercial bank.
That naturally suppresses ROE.
IDBI still generates approximately 14.8% ROE.
This makes the 1.89% ROA even more significant.
IndusInd's 6.26% ROE shows how much recovery remains
A commercial bank needs to earn a return on equity comfortably above its cost of equity over time.
At roughly 6%, IndusInd has not yet reached that state.
The immediate 1% ROA target is therefore only the first milestone.
A fully repaired bank eventually needs materially higher ROE as well.
Now add IDBI's strategic-sale optionality—but keep it probability-weighted
The long-running government and LIC strategic divestment process has moved into an advanced stage.
Fairfax Financial has been reported as the frontrunner.
Reuters reported in August that the proposal had cleared a senior bureaucratic panel and still required final ministerial and regulatory approvals.
The deal is not completed as of August 31, 2026.
Fairfax's existing CSB Bank ownership creates an additional regulatory issue
Fairfax already owns a significant stake in CSB Bank.
RBI rules do not normally permit one entity to operate two separate banking franchises indefinitely.
Reuters reported that solutions being discussed include:
- selling the CSB Bank stake.
- potentially consolidating the holdings.
These details remain part of an evolving transaction and should not be treated as finalized terms.
This makes IDBI very different from a normal high-ROA private-bank stock
Its future multiple depends partly on:
- standalone operating performance.
- sale completion probability.
- identity of the eventual owner.
- capital deployment after control changes.
The event premium can therefore move even if quarterly fundamentals remain unchanged.
IndusInd has no equivalent ownership event
Its catalyst is much more operational.
The bank needs to:
- restore year-on-year loan growth.
- increase granular deposits.
- improve core NIM.
- reduce credit cost.
- move ROA through 1%.
This makes IndusInd's catalyst slower but easier to measure through quarterly financial statements.
Valuation creates the most interesting contradiction
August 28, 2026:
- IDBI P/E: approximately 10.69x.
- IDBI P/B: approximately 1.59x.
- IndusInd P/E: approximately 58.50x.
- IndusInd P/B: approximately 1.17x.
At first glance those figures look incompatible.
They are not.
IndusInd's huge P/E is a denominator problem
Trailing earnings still contain the effects of its crisis period, depressed profitability and past losses.
That makes trailing P/E a weak measure of normalized value today.
Investors are effectively paying for a recovery that has not yet fully appeared in trailing EPS.
P/B is currently the cleaner IndusInd valuation lens.
IDBI's P/E is much more usable
IDBI's current trailing earnings reflect a profitable bank rather than a crisis-distorted base.
A roughly 10.7x P/E for a bank producing 1.89% ROA appears much more conventional.
The higher 1.59x P/B reflects the fact that each rupee of IDBI book equity currently earns substantially more than IndusInd book equity.
Does IndusInd's 1.17x book valuation already assume recovery?
To some extent, yes.
A bank earning only 6%-plus ROE would not normally deserve a premium to book if those returns were permanent.
The market is therefore implicitly assuming that:
- ROA rises.
- ROE rises.
- credit costs fall.
- governance concerns fade.
Part of the turnaround is already embedded in the multiple.
What would make IndusInd's P/B attractive?
The cleanest confirmation would be:
- ROA reaches 1% by the end of FY27.
- Core NIM recovers above 3.4%-3.5%.
- Year-on-year credit growth turns positive.
- GNPA continues moving toward 3% or lower.
- Credit cost moves materially lower.
- ROE moves toward double digits and beyond.
If those milestones arrive together, the current book multiple can become much easier to defend.
What would make IDBI's 1.59x book look reasonable?
IDBI needs to preserve:
- ROA around 1.7%-1.9%.
- NIM comfortably above 3.5%.
- NNPA near current levels.
- double-digit deposit growth.
- mid-to-high-teens or better credit growth.
and eventually demonstrate productive use of its huge capital surplus.
Bull Run's August 25 snapshot shows very different market narratives
| Bull Run Snapshot — 25 Aug 2026 | IDBI Bank | IndusInd Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹88.31 | ₹1,015.00 |
| Market capitalisation | ₹92,761 Cr | ₹78,709 Cr |
| 1-month return | +3.98% | +1.90% |
| 3-month return | +20.17% | +8.87% |
| 6-month return | -22.34% | +5.22% |
| 1-year return | -6.56% | +31.67% |
| 52-week high | ₹118.38 | ₹1,068.80 |
| 52-week low | ₹61.01 | ₹710.60 |
| RSI 14 | 65.48 | 51.57 |
| Dividend yield | 2.44% | 0.15% |
| Bull Run Score | 50.6/100 | 2.3/100 |
The low Bull Run score on IndusInd reflects the fact that several trailing financial indicators still carry the impact of its recent crisis and recovery period.
That makes current-quarter trend analysis especially important.
IDBI's recent three-month momentum is more event-sensitive
Its approximately 20% three-month return overlaps with renewed progress in the strategic divestment process.
Investors should therefore avoid attributing all recent price movement to bank operating fundamentals.
IndusInd's strong one-year return tells us recovery expectations are already rising
The share price has recovered significantly from crisis-period lows.
This means the market no longer treats the bank as a pure distress situation.
Future rerating now requires operating proof rather than simply relief that the worst governance concerns are behind it.
What can break each thesis?
IDBI Bank
- NIM continues declining from the current 3.61% level.
- 22% loan growth produces delayed credit deterioration.
- ROA falls materially from 1.89%.
- The strategic sale is delayed again or final terms disappoint expectations.
- Excess capital remains under-deployed and limits ROE improvement.
IndusInd Bank
- Year-on-year credit growth remains negative.
- Core NIM remains near 3.35% or declines further.
- Credit-cost normalization stalls.
- MFI, vehicle or unsecured stress reappears.
- ROA fails to reach the approximately 1% exit target.
- Governance confidence deteriorates again.
IDBI Bank vs IndusInd Bank: current conclusion
IDBI Bank is currently the stronger bank by a wide margin.
IndusInd Bank offers the larger operating-recovery opportunity.
IDBI Bank vs IndusInd Bank FAQs
Which bank has higher ROA?
IDBI Bank at 1.89% versus IndusInd Bank around 0.78% reported in Q1 FY2027.
Which has higher normalized NIM?
IDBI Bank. IDBI reported 3.61%; IndusInd's reported 3.57% included a tax-refund benefit and normalized to approximately 3.35%.
Which is growing loans faster?
IDBI Bank, with 22% year-on-year net-advance growth. IndusInd remained down about 2.2% year on year but grew approximately 3.3% sequentially.
Which has better CASA?
IDBI Bank at 43.64% versus IndusInd Bank at 29.43%.
Which has lower GNPA?
IDBI Bank at 2.30% versus IndusInd Bank at 3.25%.
Which has lower NNPA?
IDBI Bank at 0.16% versus IndusInd Bank at 0.95%.
Which has stronger capital?
IDBI Bank by a very wide margin, with 26.92% CRAR versus IndusInd at 17.15%.
Is IndusInd Bank recovering?
Yes, Q1 FY2027 showed sequential credit growth, better NPAs, lower provisions and improved ROA. But the bank has not yet restored year-on-year credit growth or reached its 1% ROA target.
Is IDBI Bank's sale complete?
No. The process remains advanced but pending final governmental, regulatory and transaction approvals as of August 31, 2026.
Which stock is cheaper?
IndusInd is cheaper on P/B, while IDBI is dramatically cheaper on current trailing earnings. IndusInd's P/E is currently distorted by weak crisis-period trailing profits.
Where can investors compare them on Bull Run?
Use the IDBI Bank stock page and IndusInd Bank stock page.
Research sources
Disclaimer
This article is educational and informational only. IndusInd Bank's reported Q1 FY2027 NIM of 3.57% included approximately ₹284 crore of interest on an income-tax refund; normalized NIM was approximately 3.35%. Reported ROA was also helped by this one-off income and should not be compared mechanically with IDBI Bank's ROA without adjustment. IndusInd's trailing P/E remains distorted by its recent crisis-period earnings and is therefore less useful than P/B for current relative valuation. IDBI Bank's proposed strategic sale has not completed as of August 31, 2026, and reports identifying Fairfax as frontrunner do not guarantee buyer, valuation, timing or approval. Credit losses from rapidly originated loans can emerge with a lag. Bull Run market data is dated August 25, 2026; external valuation data is dated August 28. Nothing here recommends buying, selling or holding IDBI Bank, IndusInd Bank or any security. Bull Run is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst or Investment Adviser.