Screener.in vs Trendlyne (2026): Free Data vs Paid Analytics

Which platform is better overall?

Screener.in is better overall for fundamental investors, while Trendlyne is better overall for data-heavy investors who actively use scores, alerts, technicals, and portfolio analytics. Screener.in concentrates on company research. Trendlyne spreads its value across screening, scoring, alerts, portfolios, analysts, technical data, and market intelligence.

The distinction matters because most retail investors do not use every feature inside a large analytics suite. An investor who primarily reads financial statements and runs long-term fundamental screens receives stronger value from Screener.in. An investor who monitors multiple strategies, portfolios, technical conditions, and analyst changes receives more from Trendlyne.

The winner is determined by workflow intensity, not the total number of visible features.

Who should choose Screener.in?

Screener.in fits investors who want to investigate companies through financial statements, historical ratios, custom queries, filings, annual reports, and spreadsheet models. The platform states that users can run queries on 10 to 15 years of financial data and track regulatory filings in one place.

• Fundamental investors: Users who analyse sales, profits, margins, returns, debt, cash flow, valuation, and capital allocation over long periods.
• Custom-query users: Investors who want to express a screening method through precise financial conditions.
• Document-led researchers: Users who review annual reports, announcements, concall notes, credit ratings, and insider trades.
• Excel users: Investors who export structured financial data or upload personalised spreadsheet templates.
• Company trackers: Users who monitor a defined research universe through watchlists, financial alerts, and filing updates.

Who should choose Trendlyne?

Trendlyne fits investors who need a broader analytical system covering scores, screeners, portfolios, technical data, alerts, analyst estimates, ownership changes, and backtesting. Its value rises when the user has a defined process for acting on each type of information.

• Advanced screeners: Users who combine fundamental, technical, ownership, analyst, and score-based conditions.
• DVM users: Investors who separate durability, valuation, and momentum into distinct research dimensions.
• Portfolio analysts: Users who want performance, risk, return, sector diversification, tax, and profit and loss analysis.
• Alert-heavy investors: Users who monitor screens, portfolios, watchlists, technical changes, deals, insiders, and corporate events.
• Backtest users: Investors who test measurable screening rules across historical periods before using them in current research.

How do Screener.in and Trendlyne compare feature by feature?

Screener.in leads in company-level fundamental research, while Trendlyne leads in analytical breadth, scores, alerts, portfolios, and technical tools.

Which platform has the better free plan?

Screener.in has the better free plan for serious fundamental research because its core company-analysis and screening workflow remains usable without payment. The free Hobby Investor plan includes company financials, stock screens, custom ratios, fundamental charts, Excel automation, up to 50 followed companies, 10 stock alerts, two screen alerts, and two phrase alerts.

The free plan also includes 15 comparison columns, 18 quick ratios, limited concall notes, limited insights, and delayed email delivery. Result downloads, detailed peer comparison, segment results, multiple watchlists, and industry filters require Premium.

Trendlyne provides useful free access to real-time screeners, portfolio reports, SWOT analysis, superstar portfolios, delivery-volume data, stock checklists, market tools, and selected analytics. Its strongest DVM, technical, alert, and download workflows become more valuable after upgrading.

Which paid plan gives better value?

Trendlyne GuruQ gives the lower entry price, while Screener.in Active Investor gives stronger value to users who spend most of their time analysing company fundamentals. Screener.in Active Investor costs ₹4,999 per year, including GST. Trendlyne GuruQ currently costs ₹310 per month or ₹2,190 per year.

Trendlyne StratQ costs ₹5,900 per year and targets users who need real-time alerts, more than 3,500 screener parameters, 15-minute technical data, and broader analytical limits. StratQ is not a direct replacement for Screener.in Premium because it supports a wider active-investor workflow.

GuruQ is cheaper. Screener.in Premium is more focused. StratQ is more expansive. The best value comes from the plan whose paid features appear repeatedly in completed research.

What does Screener.in Premium unlock?

Screener.in Premium removes research limits around company tracking, alerts, comparison columns, downloads, segment results, and document access. The Active Investor plan currently includes ₹500 of Screener AI credits, up to 800 stock alerts, 75 screen alerts, 50 phrase alerts, and 55 comparison columns.

Premium also adds detailed peer comparison, segment results, 60 quick ratios, downloadable screen results, industry filters, prioritised email delivery, multiple watchlists, access to trends for more than 10,000 products, and priority support.

The strongest reason to pay is not one isolated feature. Premium becomes useful when the investor follows a large company universe and regularly uses alerts, downloads, segments, concalls, peer tables, and custom comparison columns.

What does Trendlyne GuruQ unlock?

Trendlyne GuruQ unlocks the core paid Trendlyne workflow for Indian investors who want DVM scores, screeners, portfolio tools, reports, alerts, and broader analytical access. The official plan page positions GuruQ for Indian investors looking for DVM scores, screeners, portfolio tools, and related research features.

GuruQ is priced below Screener.in Premium, but the two plans solve different problems. GuruQ gives investors more prebuilt analytical structure. Screener.in gives investors more control over company fundamentals and custom financial research.

GuruQ fits investors who want Trendlyne’s scores and portfolio ecosystem without paying for StratQ’s higher-frequency technical and screener capabilities.

What does Trendlyne StratQ unlock?

Trendlyne StratQ unlocks the platform’s more advanced screening, technical, alert, and data workflow. Trendlyne describes StratQ as GuruQ for India plus real-time alerts, more than 3,500 screener parameters, and 15-minute technical data.

The annual price is currently ₹5,900. That price sits above Screener.in Premium because StratQ targets investors who actively use technical timeframes, frequent alerts, large parameter libraries, downloads, and backtesting.

StratQ is excessive for an investor who checks quarterly results and reads annual reports. It is more suitable for an investor who runs multiple strategies and monitors changing conditions throughout the market week.

Which platform has better fundamental data?

Screener.in has better fundamental data presentation for company-level research because it organises long financial histories, schedules, ratios, segments, peers, and official documents in one focused interface. Users can click financial line items for detailed schedules and inspect business performance across more than ten years.

Screener.in also handles standalone and consolidated data automatically, supports custom ratios, and lets users choose result columns. This structure suits analysts who want to understand how a company’s financial record developed.

Trendlyne combines fundamentals with more external and market-linked inputs, including analyst estimates, ownership changes, technical indicators, scores, and news. Trendlyne has greater breadth. Screener.in has greater fundamental focus.

Which platform has the better stock screener?

Screener.in has the better screener for custom fundamental formulas, while Trendlyne has the better screener for combining fundamentals with technicals, scores, ownership, analysts, and market signals. Screener.in lets investors create equations, custom ratios, custom columns, and automatic alerts tied to financial results.

Trendlyne provides free real-time screeners, DVM score screeners, AI-assisted screener creation, technical screeners, prebuilt strategies, and paid alert workflows. Its advanced plans expand the number of available parameters and monitoring frequency.

Screener.in fits an investor who knows which accounting and valuation conditions to test. Trendlyne fits an investor who wants several types of market data inside one screen.

Which platform has better stock scores?

Trendlyne has better stock scoring because its DVM framework separates company durability, valuation, and momentum into distinct scores from 0 to 100. Durability examines financial consistency, revenue, profit, cash flow, and debt. Valuation uses pricing measures such as P/E and P/BV. Momentum reflects price, volume, sentiment, and technical indicators.

The scores update as financial, ownership, insider, valuation, and market data change. Momentum updates at the end of the trading day, while durability and valuation can react when new results or ownership data arrive.

Screener.in provides automated pros and cons and lets investors create their own ratios and screens. That gives more control but less ready-made scoring structure.

Which platform is better for technical analysis?

Trendlyne is better for technical analysis because Screener.in is primarily a fundamental company-research platform. Trendlyne supports technical indicators across timeframes and includes real-time screeners, market breadth, delivery-volume data, alerts, buy-sell valuation zones, and technical parameters on paid plans.

Screener.in provides price and volume charts with historical delivery percentages, but it does not position technical strategy creation as its core purpose. Investors who depend heavily on intraday charts and custom indicators can still prefer Chartink or TradingView over either platform.

Trendlyne wins when technical conditions form part of the written research method. Screener.in wins when price behaviour remains secondary to company fundamentals.

Which platform is better for portfolio analysis?

Trendlyne is better for portfolio analysis because it evaluates holdings through performance, risk, returns, sector diversification, tax, profit and loss, corporate actions, and alerts. Its portfolio report is available as part of the broader Trendlyne feature set and supports equity and mutual fund portfolios.

Screener.in focuses on following companies rather than analysing a complete household portfolio. Users can create watchlists, import companies, receive a personal news feed, monitor insider trades, track credit ratings, and set stock or screen alerts.

Trendlyne is the stronger portfolio dashboard. Screener.in is the stronger company-research watchlist.

Which platform has better alerts?

Trendlyne has the broader alert system, while Screener.in has a strong alert system for company and fundamental-screen monitoring. Trendlyne supports alerts for stock movements, technicals, results, corporate actions, announcements, portfolios, watchlists, indices, insiders, SAST disclosures, deals, and screener entries or exits.

Screener.in’s free plan includes 10 stock alerts, two screen alerts, and two phrase alerts. Premium increases those limits to 800 stock alerts, 75 screen alerts, and 50 phrase alerts.

Trendlyne wins on alert variety. Screener.in remains highly effective when the investor mainly wants to know when a company or fundamental screen changes.

Which platform is better for analyst estimates?

Trendlyne is better for analyst estimates because broker forecasts, target-price changes, recommendation data, and research reports form a visible part of its analytical system. These inputs help investors understand what the professional research community currently expects.

Screener.in is built around company-reported data and investor-defined analysis. It provides peer comparisons, documents, financial histories, and AI access to filings, but it does not centre the interface around consensus analyst expectations.

Analyst estimates remain opinions rather than verified future outcomes. Trendlyne makes them accessible. Screener.in helps an investor construct a thesis with less dependence on them.

Which platform has better AI tools?

Screener.in has the better document-reading AI tool, while Trendlyne has the better AI-assisted screening tool. Screener AI has direct access to company filings, annual reports, and earnings-call documents. Users ask questions in plain English, and the system reads relevant company material.

Screener AI operates on a pay-as-you-use credit system. Screener.in states that a typical answer costs around ₹10 to ₹30, with higher costs for questions that require many documents. Premium includes ₹500 in AI credits.

Trendlyne’s AI screener converts plain-English screening requests into working screener queries. It also provides AI-generated conference-call summaries. Screener AI investigates one company’s documents. Trendlyne AI helps create and process broader market screens.

Which platform is better for Excel and data exports?

Screener.in is better for personalised Excel-based company modelling, while Trendlyne is better for exporting larger analytical datasets on advanced plans. Screener.in lets users export structured company data, upload a personalised Excel sheet with formulas and formatting, and reuse that format across company pages.

Premium also adds downloadable screener results and expands comparison columns from 15 to 55. This fits investors who maintain individual company models.

Trendlyne’s paid plans expand data-downloader access, screener exports, and historical datasets. That fits users who analyse large groups of stocks, strategies, scores, or market conditions outside the platform.

Which platform is easier for beginners?

Screener.in is easier for beginners who want to learn financial statements, while Trendlyne is easier only after the beginner understands what its scores and signals represent. Screener.in presents profit and loss statements, balance sheets, cash flows, ratios, peers, and documents in a consistent company format.

Trendlyne provides more guided outputs through DVM scores, SWOT, checklists, analyst data, alerts, and portfolio reports. Those outputs reduce manual calculation but introduce more concepts at once.

A beginner who wants to understand businesses should start with financial statements and a small number of ratios. A beginner who wants prebuilt analytics must still learn the limitations of each score.

Which platform is better for advanced investors?

Trendlyne is better for advanced investors who combine several data types, while Screener.in is better for advanced fundamental specialists. Trendlyne’s strongest use case includes DVM scores, technical parameters, analyst estimates, ownership changes, portfolio analysis, alerts, backtesting, and large screen libraries.

Screener.in’s advanced use case includes custom ratios, formula-based screens, long financial histories, detailed documents, segment data, Excel automation, peer comparisons, and large company-tracking limits.

An investor who studies businesses deeply should choose Screener.in. An investor who operates multiple quantitative and monitoring workflows should choose Trendlyne.

How should investors compare Screener.in and Trendlyne?

Investors should compare Screener.in and Trendlyne by completing the same research task on both platforms rather than comparing feature counts. A commercial decision becomes easier when the user measures the time and evidence required to reach a documented conclusion.

Strategy 1: test one complete company-research workflow

The first strategy is to research the same company from initial screen to final watchlist on both platforms. Record how quickly each tool exposes financial history, risks, ownership changes, valuation context, technical conditions, documents, and alerts.

Strategy 2: count only features used in a normal month

The second strategy is to ignore every feature that does not appear in the investor’s monthly research log. A backtest, alert, AI credit, download, or portfolio report has zero commercial value when the investor never uses it.

Strategy 3: separate stock scoring from stock verification

The third strategy is to use scores to narrow research and financial statements to verify it. A DVM score summarises several data dimensions. It does not replace understanding the company’s business model, accounting, industry, or management decisions.

Strategy 4: compare annual cost per completed research case

The fourth strategy is to divide the subscription price by the number of complete research cases finished with paid features. This exposes whether a cheaper plan saves money or simply remains unused.

Strategy 5: choose one primary platform

The fifth strategy is to make one platform the primary research system and use the second only for a specialised gap. Running the same screens, watchlists, and alerts on both products creates duplication instead of better evidence.

How do Screener.in and Trendlyne score in a weighted comparison?

Screener.in scores higher for a fundamental-investor rubric, while Trendlyne scores higher when alerts, portfolios, technicals, and analytical breadth receive more weight.

The narrow result changes when fundamental depth receives more weight, which places Screener.in first for long-term company research.

Which platform fits each type of investor?

Screener.in fits company-focused investors, while Trendlyne fits investors who want a broader market analytics system.

Is Screener.in enough without Trendlyne?

Screener.in is enough for investors whose process centres on company fundamentals, custom financial screens, documents, and long-term monitoring. Its free plan already completes a meaningful research workflow, while Premium removes limits for active company tracking and detailed analysis.

Trendlyne becomes useful when the investor repeatedly needs DVM scores, technical conditions, analyst estimates, portfolio analytics, ownership intelligence, backtests, and broader real-time alerts.

Paying for Trendlyne without using those workflows creates feature accumulation rather than better research. Screener.in remains sufficient until a specific analytical gap appears in completed work.

Is Trendlyne enough without Screener.in?

Trendlyne is enough for investors who want one broad platform for screeners, scores, portfolios, analysts, technicals, alerts, and market intelligence. Its stock pages and analytical tools provide substantial company context without requiring a second subscription.

Screener.in remains useful when the investor wants cleaner financial statements, formula-style fundamental screens, custom ratios, detailed schedules, long document histories, or personalised Excel models.

Trendlyne covers more research categories. Screener.in often provides a more focused experience for analysing the financial record of one company.

Where does Bull Run fit if neither platform matches?

Bull Run is the stronger alternative for Indian investors who want AI-guided screening, a composite quality score, side-by-side stock comparison, watchlists, and IPO GMP tracking in a simpler connected workflow. It covers more than 5,000 NSE and BSE stocks and provides over 25 screening metrics.

The free tier includes the core screener, fundamental data, and IPO GMP dashboard. Premium costs ₹999 per quarter or ₹2,499 per year and adds Ask AI, unlimited screening, unlimited comparisons, paper trading, an ad-free experience, and priority support.

Screener.in remains better for detailed company financials, filings, custom ratios, and Excel modelling. Trendlyne remains better for advanced screeners, DVM scores, technicals, alerts, backtesting, and portfolio analytics.

Which official sources support this comparison?

The official product, pricing, feature, and methodology pages below support the current claims used in this comparison.

• Screener.in official features page
• Screener.in official free and Premium plan comparison
• Screener AI official product and pricing information
• Screener.in official getting-started guide
• Trendlyne official subscription plans
• Trendlyne official feature matrix
• Trendlyne official DVM score methodology