See Bull Run's current pages for Siemens Limited and Hitachi Energy India. Related comparisons include Siemens vs ABB India, Hitachi Energy India vs GE Vernova T&D India and Siemens vs CG Power.

Q1 FY27 scorecard: Siemens is bigger, Hitachi is converting faster

The strongest Hitachi number is not revenue growth—it is order density

That is an approximate Q1 book-to-bill ratio of 2.04x.

Siemens received ₹6,328 crore of new orders against ₹4,714 crore of revenue.

Its equivalent ratio is approximately 1.34x.

These are Bull Run analytical calculations rather than company-reported KPIs.

Both are above 1x—and that matters

A book-to-bill ratio above one means orders are arriving faster than revenue is being recognized.

That expands future revenue visibility.

But Hitachi's current ratio is especially strong because grid equipment remains supply constrained globally.

Hitachi's backlog is smaller in absolute terms but larger relative to its revenue run rate

Dividing backlog by one quarter of current revenue gives approximately:

• Siemens: 9.9x quarterly revenue;
• Hitachi Energy India: 12.9x quarterly revenue.

This does not mean either backlog converts in exactly that many quarters.

Long-cycle HVDC and Mobility projects can take years.

The calculation simply shows how large future contracted work is relative to today's business size.

Hitachi's grid backlog is more concentrated

Q1 order intake was driven by:

• HVDC;
• grid-connection solutions;
• power-quality equipment;
• transformers;
• data centres;
• renewables;
• industry;
• services.

That concentration is powerful when grid investment is booming.

It also makes Hitachi more dependent on the grid cycle.

Siemens spreads demand across three distinct industrial engines

Digital Industries received Q1 orders from:

• solar-cell manufacturing;
• metals;
• electronics;
• pharmaceuticals;
• water.

Smart Infrastructure grew across grid modernization, data centres and commercial real estate.

Mobility benefited from rolling-stock activity.

This diversification reduces single-cycle dependence

A slowdown in one market can be offset by another.

For example:

• factory automation follows manufacturing capex;
• Smart Infrastructure follows electrification and building capex;
• Mobility follows rail and metro investment.

Hitachi is much more concentrated around electricity transmission and grid technology.

Concentration is currently an advantage for Hitachi

They require:

• large specialized factories;
• long testing cycles;
• high-voltage laboratories;
• specialist engineering;
• customer qualification;
• complex supply chains;
• years of project execution experience.

That creates scarcity pricing and strong factory utilisation when demand accelerates.

Hitachi Q1 revenue increased nearly ₹1,015 crore year on year

Revenue rose from approximately ₹1,478.9 crore to ₹2,493.7 crore.

The increase was 68.6%.

This is not a small-base software-style business.

It is heavy electrical equipment and project execution.

Growing this rapidly requires both demand and physical manufacturing capacity.

Operational EBITDA grew with the revenue

Hitachi generated approximately ₹399.9 crore of Operational EBITDA.

Margin reached 16.0%.

PBT increased 120.2% to ₹389.5 crore.

PAT increased 123.5% to ₹294.2 crore.

That is the definition of positive operating leverage

Revenue increased 69%.

PAT increased 124%.

Fixed manufacturing and engineering infrastructure is being utilized more efficiently as backlog converts.

Siemens is facing the opposite short-term problem

Revenue increased 14.8%.

Yet profit from operations was only approximately ₹356 crore.

Management highlighted:

• higher commodity prices;
• rupee depreciation;
• material-cost inflation;
• foreign-exchange volatility.

Continuing PAT was ₹343 crore.

Siemens demand is not weak

This distinction is essential.

New orders increased 16.5% to ₹6,328 crore.

Order backlog increased 9.6% to ₹46,670 crore.

Management said Q1 order growth was primarily driven by Smart Infrastructure.

The problem is price-cost timing

A capital-goods order may be won months before materials are purchased.

If copper, electrical steel, imported components or currency move unfavourably after pricing, margin can compress before new pricing catches up.

This is what Siemens is currently navigating.

Hitachi had favourable product mix instead

Management cited:

• efficient execution;
• favourable product mix;
• operational efficiencies;
• higher export contribution.

Those forces helped push Operational EBITDA margin to 16%.

Exports are becoming important for Hitachi Energy India

Exports represented approximately 33.6% of Q1 orders when HVDC orders are excluded from the denominator used by management.

Orders came from:

• Europe;
• North America;
• South Asia.

This gives the Indian manufacturing base access to global grid shortages.

That can extend growth beyond India's own grid cycle

If global transformer and power-quality lead times remain long, Hitachi Energy India's factories can serve both domestic and export demand.

This improves capacity utilization.

It also exposes the company to global currency, trade and project risk.

Hitachi's first BESS order opens another growth category

The company secured its first battery-energy-storage-system order for a:

• 165 MW;
• 330 MWh;
• project in Andhra Pradesh.

Storage is increasingly necessary as renewable penetration rises.

BESS changes the grid from passive transmission to active balancing

Solar and wind generation are variable.

Battery storage can:

• shift energy across hours;
• stabilize frequency;
• reduce curtailment;
• support peak demand;
• improve renewable integration.

This gives Hitachi another adjacent product category around grid modernization.

HVDC remains the higher-barrier moat

India requires long-distance transmission from renewable-rich regions to load centres.

HVDC is particularly useful for:

• very long transmission corridors;
• high power transfer;
• underground urban transmission;
• renewable integration;
• constrained right-of-way.

Hitachi has already executed one of India's most complex urban HVDC projects

The Kudus–Aarey project in Mumbai supplies up to approximately 1,000 MW into the city.

It increased externally supplied power capability dramatically while using underground infrastructure in a land-constrained urban environment.

Projects like this are difficult to commoditize.

Siemens has a different complex-project moat in Mobility

Recent orders include:

• electrification of the Rishikesh–Karnaprayag rail line;
• advanced overhead catenary systems;
• Pune Metro propulsion systems;
• Train Control and Monitoring Systems;
• rolling-stock technology.

These are not directly comparable with transformers.

They provide a different kind of long-cycle engineering visibility.

Data centres are becoming a point of overlap

Both companies benefit from AI and cloud infrastructure.

Data centres require huge amounts of reliable electrical infrastructure:

• grid connections;
• transformers;
• switchgear;
• power quality;
• medium-voltage distribution;
• automation;
• redundancy systems.

Hitachi participates closer to the grid edge

Its Q1 order mix specifically highlighted data-centre demand for grid solutions.

Large transformers and grid connections can become bottlenecks for new data-centre campuses.

Siemens participates deeper inside the facility

Smart Infrastructure serves electrical distribution and building infrastructure.

The wider Siemens ecosystem is also developing technologies for next-generation AI data-centre power architectures.

The listed Indian opportunity is therefore more diversified across the facility stack.

The biggest Hitachi investment is the new Karjan transformer factory

Construction began in June 2026.

The facility is scheduled for completion in FY28.

It will support:

• large power transformers;
• high-voltage transmission;
• HVDC;
• power generation;
• AI data centres;
• large industrial applications.

This will become Hitachi's 20th manufacturing unit in India

The company already has a deep local manufacturing base.

The new factory is significant because large transformers require long lead times and large physical manufacturing footprints.

₹2,000 crore is a substantial bet relative to Hitachi India's size

FY26 revenue was approximately ₹8,148 crore.

The new factory investment is therefore close to one-quarter of one year's FY26 revenue.

That raises the importance of future utilization.

Scarcity can justify the capex—but only if the cycle persists

Transformer demand is supported by:

• renewables;
• transmission corridors;
• urban electricity demand;
• data centres;
• industrial electrification;
• grid replacement;
• export shortages.

If these remain strong through FY28 and beyond, the factory can enter an attractive demand environment.

Siemens also has meaningful Smart Infrastructure manufacturing capacity

Its Indian operations manufacture and engineer products across:

• switchgear;
• vacuum interrupters;
• gas-insulated switchgear;
• electrical distribution;
• industrial automation;
• mobility technology.

The key difference is that Siemens's capital deployment is spread over multiple industrial markets rather than primarily grid transformers.

Which business has the stronger current capital returns?

Hitachi earns the higher current ROCE

Approximately 27.7% versus Siemens at 22.2%.

ROE is almost identical at around 21%.

The major valuation difference is what investors pay for those returns.

Hitachi is worth more despite being much smaller by revenue

Hitachi's market cap is about 19% higher

Yet Siemens Q1 revenue is about 89% larger.

The market is therefore assigning a very large premium to Hitachi's:

• growth;
• grid scarcity;
• margin;
• backlog density;
• capacity expansion;
• HVDC exposure.

The Siemens headline P/E is not clean

The gain sits in discontinued operations.

It is not recurring Smart Infrastructure, Digital Industries or Mobility earnings.

It materially boosts trailing reported EPS.

That means 37.2x versus 131.7x exaggerates the valuation gap

A simple Q1 continuing-earnings annualisation illustrates this.

Siemens:

• Q1 continuing PAT: ₹343 crore;
• annualized: approximately ₹1,372 crore;
• market cap: approximately ₹1.272 lakh crore;
• rough run-rate P/E: approximately 93x.

Hitachi:

• Q1 PAT: ₹294.2 crore;
• annualized: approximately ₹1,177 crore;
• market cap: approximately ₹1.515 lakh crore;
• rough run-rate P/E: approximately 129x.

These are not forecasts

Project companies have seasonal revenue and margins.

The exercise simply removes the obvious distortion from Siemens's disposal gain.

Hitachi still trades at a large premium—but not at the absurd 3.5x P/E gap implied by headline trailing numbers.

The premium depends on Hitachi maintaining extraordinary execution

At a triple-digit normalized earnings multiple, Hitachi needs:

• backlog conversion;
• 16%-plus operating economics;
• fast capacity commissioning;
• strong export demand;
• continued transformer scarcity;
• successful HVDC execution.

A normal industrial slowdown could compress the multiple sharply.

Siemens has more room for self-help

Its current problem is not lack of orders.

It is margin conversion.

If material-cost and currency pressure normalize while Smart Infrastructure remains strong, Siemens can grow earnings faster than revenue without needing a major change in the demand environment.

That gives Siemens a different asymmetry

Hitachi needs to preserve exceptional conditions.

Siemens needs to recover from weak current conditions.

One is a scarcity premium.

The other is a margin-recovery thesis.

Which has the larger order backlog?

Siemens.

Approximately ₹46,670 crore versus Hitachi Energy India at ₹32,222.1 crore.

Which has stronger backlog relative to current revenue?

Hitachi Energy India.

Its backlog is roughly 12.9 times one quarter's revenue versus Siemens around 9.9 times.

Which is growing faster?

Hitachi Energy India by a wide margin.

Q1 revenue grew 68.6% versus Siemens at 14.8%.

Which currently has stronger margins?

Hitachi Energy India.

Operational EBITDA margin was 16.0% versus Siemens profit-from-operations margin of 7.6%, while acknowledging different definitions.

Which is more diversified?

Siemens.

Its exposure spans Smart Infrastructure, Digital Industries and Mobility.

Which is the purer grid-equipment play?

Hitachi Energy India.

Transformers, HVDC, power quality and grid integration sit at the centre of the business.

Which has higher ROCE?

Hitachi Energy India.

Approximately 27.7% versus Siemens at 22.2% under Bull Run's standardized methodology.

Which stock is cheaper?

Siemens on normalized current earnings, but not by nearly as much as the headline P/E suggests.

Siemens's 37.2x reported P/E is distorted by the LVM disposal gain.

A rough Q1 continuing-earnings annualisation gives around 93x for Siemens versus roughly 129x for Hitachi.

Which is better: Siemens or Hitachi Energy India?

Siemens currently has the stronger diversified-franchise profile. It produces substantially more revenue, carries the larger absolute backlog and participates across industrial automation, smart electrical infrastructure and mobility rather than depending primarily on one infrastructure cycle.

Hitachi Energy India currently has the stronger operating-momentum profile. Revenue grew nearly 69%, PAT more than doubled, Operational EBITDA margin reached 16%, order intake is more than twice quarterly revenue and a ₹2,000 crore transformer factory will expand exposure to one of the most supply-constrained segments of global electrification.

The valuation already recognizes much of Hitachi's advantage.

Its market capitalisation exceeds Siemens despite substantially lower current revenue.

At September 2026 valuations, Siemens offers the better margin-recovery and diversification setup, while Hitachi offers the purer grid-scarcity growth setup. Hitachi remains stronger operationally today; Siemens becomes more attractive if Smart Infrastructure growth persists and operating margins recover, because its normalized valuation is materially below Hitachi's without requiring the headline 37x P/E illusion.

Frequently asked questions